– Download: One-Page Summary
Abstract: With longer expected lifetimes and a low median savings rate, an increasing number of elderly Americans will need to work past a typical current retirement age. This may be made more difficult by old age discrimination and various adverse employment shocks at old age such as Covid-19. Hiring subsidies for older workers are among the active labor market policies that could increase firms’ demand of elderly labor. In a computable overlapping generations model with labor market frictions, I examine the long-term hiring subsidies absent of any shocks and the short-term hiring subsidies following an adverse elderly employment shock.
I find that when a long-term hiring subsidy is introduced, a firm replaces general vacancies with specific elderly-targeting vacancies. This allows an increase of elderly employment in the long run at a cost of lower employment of a workforce below the subsidy-protected age. This hiring subsidy does not increase overall demand for labor but simply shifts the demand from younger to older workers. As the elderly-protecting hiring subsidy increases, there is an increasingly distortionary effect on the youth employment causing an aggregate decrease in employment and large welfare losses no matter the financing of the subsidy. The results are equivalent when wage subsidy is used to increase elderly employment.
A short-term elderly-targeting hiring subsidy after an adverse shock to elderly employment has a positive consumption and welfare effects on multiple generations directly affected by the unexpected shock but, again, negatively affects the younger generations via distorted competition in the labor market. The negative effect on the younger cohorts also increase the time until full recovery to the steady state.
– Download: One-Page Summary
Abstract: Portfolio allocation decisions over the lifecycle depend on the retirement income and risks faced in retirement. However, due to computational complexity, many features of retirement income are typically assumed away. By building on the standard lifecycle investment-consumption model that includes a realistic retirement income, I discuss how each aspect of retirement income affects optimal portfolio allocation over the lifecycle. I find that all investors maintain high levels of stocks in their portfolios at a young age. However, investors who face low net replacement rates, risk of forced retirement, or retirement income uncertainty, hedge these risks by accumulating higher private savings and reducing risky portfolio share at an earlier age. In a realistic setting with risks and endogenous retirement age, equity portfolio share temporarily increases once the investor becomes eligible for retirement.